Risk of Aneurysm Rupture (ROAR) study: protocol for a long-term, longitudinal, UK multicentre study of unruptured intracranial aneurysms.

INTRODUCTION: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) are common in the adult population, but only a relatively small proportion will rupture. It is therefore essential to have accurate estimates of rupture risk to target treatment towards those who stand to benefit and avoid exposing patients to the risks of unnecessary treatment. The best available UIA natural history data are the PHASES study. However, this has never been validated and given the known heterogeneity in the populations, methods and biases of the constituent studies, there is a need to do so. There are also many potential predictors not considered in PHASES that require evaluation, and the estimated rupture risk is largely based on short-term follow-up (mostly 1 year). The aims of this study are to: (1) test the accuracy of PHASES in a UK population, (2) evaluate additional predictors of rupture and (3) assess long-term UIA rupture rates. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Risk of Aneurysm Rupture study is a longitudinal multicentre study that will identify patients with known UIA seen in neurosurgery units. Patients will have baseline demographics and aneurysm characteristics collected by their neurosurgery unit and then a single aggregated national cohort will be linked to databases of hospital admissions and deaths to identify all patients who may have subsequently suffered a subarachnoid haemorrhage. All matched admissions and deaths will be checked against medical records to confirm the diagnosis of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. The target sample size is 20 000 patients. The primary outcome will be aneurysm rupture resulting in hospital admission or death. Cox regression models will be built to test each of the study's aims. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been given by South Central Hampshire A Research Ethics Committee (21SC0064) and Confidentiality Advisory Group support (21CAG0033) provided under Section 251 of the NHS Act 2006. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN17658526.

A survey of the radiological follow-up of unruptured intracranial aneurysms in the United Kingdom.

OBJECTIVE: Unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIA) are common. For many the treatment risks outweigh their risk of subarachnoid haemorrhage and patients undergo surveillance imaging. There is little data to inform if and how to monitor UIAs resulting in widely varying practices. This study aimed to determine the current practice of unruptured UIA surveillance in the United Kingdom. METHODS: A questionnaire was designed to address the themes of surveillance protocols for UIA including when surveillance is initiated, how frequently it is performed, and when it is terminated. Additionally, how aneurysm growth is managed and how clinically meaningful growth is defined were explored. The questionnaire was distributed to members of the British Neurovascular Group using probability-based cluster and non-probability purposive sampling methods. RESULTS: Responses were received from 30 of the 30 (100.0%) adult neurosurgical units in the United Kingdom of which 27 (90.0%) routinely perform surveillance for aneurysm growth. Only four units had a unit policy. The mean patient age up to which a unit would initiate follow-up of a low-risk UIA was 65.4 ± 9.0 years. The time points at which imaging is performed varied widely. There was an even split between whether units use a fixed duration of follow-up or an age threshold for terminating surveillance. Forty percent of units will follow-up patients more than 5 years from diagnosis. The magnitude in the change in size that was felt to constitute growth ranged from 1 to 3mm. No units routinely used vessel wall imaging although 27 had access to 3T MRI capable of performing it. CONCLUSIONS: There is marked heterogeneity in surveillance practices between units in the United Kingdom. This study will help units better understand their practice relative to their peers and provide a framework forplanning further research on aneurysm growth.

Early Cerebral Infarction After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Is Associated with Prior Global Cerebral Hypoperfusion.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Early cerebral infarction (ECI) is an independent factor associated with poor outcome following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). We aimed to test the association between ECI and prior global impairment of cerebral perfusion. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients admitted for aSAH in 2 centers. ECI was defined as any radiological cerebral infarction identified within 3 days from the onset of bleeding and not related to aneurysm repair. Global impairment of cerebral perfusion was defined as clinical or transcranial Doppler signs of brain hypoperfusion together with circulatory failure or intracranial hypertension in keeping with guidelines. The association between ECI and prior occurrence of global impairment of cerebral perfusion was tested using binary logistic regression adjusted for confounders identified in the univariate analysis. RESULTS: Seven hundred fifty-three patients with aSAH were included. ECI was observed in 40 patients (5.3%; 95% CI = 3.7%-6.9%). Prior global impairment of cerebral perfusion occurred in 90% of them (60% in-hospital) versus in 11% of patients without ECI (P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade (OR = 2.3, 95% CI = 1.5-3.6, P<0.001), global impairment of cerebral perfusion due to circulatory failure (OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 1.8-11, P = 0.001), or intracranial hypertension (OR = 11.1, 95% CI = 3.8-32.3, P<0.001) was an independent risk factor for ECI. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that ECI is strongly associated with the prior occurrence of global impairment of cerebral perfusion, independent of World Federation of Neurological Surgeons grade. These patients may benefit from more intensive and systematic prevention of impaired cerebral perfusion, particularly in poor-grade patients.

Beneficial Effect of Sodium Nitrite on EEG Ischaemic Markers in Patients with Subarachnoid Haemorrhage.

Subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) is associated with long-term disability, serious reduction in quality of life and significant mortality. Early brain injury (EBI) refers to the pathological changes in cerebral metabolism and blood flow that happen in the first few days after ictus and may lead on to delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI). A disruption of the nitric oxide (NO) pathway is hypothesised as a key mechanism underlying EBI. A decrease in the alpha-delta power ratio (ADR) of the electroencephalogram has been related to cerebral ischaemia. In an experimental medicine study, we tested the hypothesis that intravenous sodium nitrite, an NO donor, would lead to increases in ADR. We studied 33 patients with acute aneurysmal SAH in the EBI phase. Participants were randomised to either sodium nitrite or saline infusion for 1 h. EEG measurements were taken before the start of and during the infusion. Twenty-eight patients did not develop DCI and five patients developed DCI. In the patients who did not develop DCI, we found an increase in ADR during sodium nitrite versus saline infusion. In the five patients who developed DCI, we did not observe a consistent pattern of ADR changes. We suggest that ADR power changes in response to nitrite infusion reflect a NO-mediated reduction in cerebral ischaemia and increase in perfusion, adding further evidence to the role of the NO pathway in EBI after SAH. Our findings provide the basis for future clinical trials employing NO donors after SAH.

Intensive therapies of delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a propensity-matched comparison of different center-driven strategies.

BACKGROUND: Intensive therapies of delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) have still controversial and unproven benefit. We aimed to compare the overall efficacy of two different center-driven strategies for the treatment of DCI respectively with and without vasospasm angioplasty. METHODS: Two hundred consecutive patients with aSAH were enrolled in each of two northern European centers. In an interventional center, vasospasm angioplasty was indicated as first line rather than rescue treatment of DCI using distal percutaneous balloon angioplasty technique combined with intravenous milrinone. In non-interventional center, induced hypertension was the only intensive therapy of DCI. Radiological DCI (new cerebral infarcts not visible on immediate post-treatment imaging), death at 1 month, and favorable outcome at 6 months (modified Rankin scale score ≤ 2) were retrospectively analyzed by independent observers and compared between two centers before and after propensity score (PS) matching for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics only differed between centers for age and rate of smokers and patients with chronic high blood pressure. In the interventional center, vasospasm angioplasty was performed in 38% of patients with median time from bleeding of 8 days (Q1 = 6.5;Q3 = 10). There was no significant difference of incidence of radiological DCI (9% vs.14%, P = 0.11), death (8% vs. 9%, P = 0.4), and favorable outcome 74% vs. 72% (P = 0.4) between interventional and non-interventional centers before and after PS matching. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest either that there is no benefit, or might be minimal, of one between two different center-driven strategies for intensive treatment of DCI. Despite potential lack of power or unknown confounders in our study, these results question the use of such intensive therapies in daily practice without further optimization and validation.